EMERSON ASCO SCG353A050.24/DC – 2/2, G2, Threaded Connection, 24V DC, 66mm Orifice Size, 0.35-8.5 Max BAR, Series 353 Dust Collector Pulse Valves
-
£311.12
Price Each:
(exc. VAT)
This item is currently out of stock, awaiting replenishment. Please contact us for a lead time.
Enquire about this product:
Description
SCG353A050 24V DC – EMERSON ASCO 353 Dust Collector Valve
The ASCO Series 353 is a top-performing solenoid pilot-operated diaphragm valve designed for use in reverse-jet dust collector systems. Its high flow rates and fast response times make it ideal for achieving optimal filter cleaning results, while consuming less air and saving energy in the process. With a patented Quick Mount Clamp connection, installation is faster and easier than ever before.
This valve is built to last, with a long life and high peak pressure, making it suitable for use in a wide range of applications. Its extended temperature range and rugged construction make it ideal for use in harsh environments.
Complying with all relevant European Community Directives, the ASCO Series 353 is a reliable, efficient and safe choice for controlling dust collector systems. Get the best performance out of your dust collector system with the ASCO Series 353 solenoid pilot-operated diaphragm valve.
Manufacturer Product Reference: SCG353A050.24/DC
See more from this series, Click Here!
Additional information
| Weight | 3.11 kg |
|---|---|
| Manufacturer | ASCO |
| Orifice Size | 66 mm |
| Body Material | Aluminium |
| Seal Material | NBR |
| Flow Coefficient KV (m3/h) | 77 |
| Flow Coefficient KV (l/min) | 1290 |
| Media | Air |
| Port Connection | G2 |
| Voltage | 24V DC |
| Working Pressure Min | 0.35 Bar |
| Working Pressure Max | 8.5 Bar |
1 review for EMERSON ASCO SCG353A050.24/DC – 2/2, G2, Threaded Connection, 24V DC, 66mm Orifice Size, 0.35-8.5 Max BAR, Series 353 Dust Collector Pulse Valves
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Lucia Pace (verified customer✔️) –
For this quality product I expected a higher cost but was thankfully proven wrong.